"Every attempt to attach this hope to visible symptoms in our surroundings becomes a temptation when it prevents us from the realization that promises, not concrete successes, are the basis of Christian leadership. Many ministers, priests and Christian laymen have become disillusioned, bitter and even hostile when years of hard work bear no fruit, when little change is accomplished. Building a vocation on the expectations of concrete results, however conceived, is like building a house on sand instead of on solid rock, and even takes away the ability to accept successes as free gifts."
I think I agree with Nouwen’s sentiments about what faith is but find it hard to grasp this idea of having hope (i.e. not becoming disillusioned, bitter, discouraged) in the total absence of "concrete successes" in the visible world. I think you’d have to be some kind of robot to blindly continue to pursue "hope" without seeing some glimmers of light guiding you to the Bigger light at the end of the tunnel. Am I wrong about this? Maybe I’m just a donkey that needs "a carrot" of incentive to keep me moving now and then?
At least that’s how I’m feeling currently. Even in the wilderness God provided manna from heaven and a water fountain on occasion when the Israelites needed it. Otherwise, we as humans, tend to rush towards fatalism. So my question is: Is looking for and wanting to see "successes" in our Christian life a culturally-learned or Kingdom-designed principle? I know it shouldn’t be our primary motivation (obedience should be!) but is it "wrong" to expect it and to get disappointed when it is not achieved? If expecting God’s promises to come to fruition is the "solid rock" we are building on, can’t some degree of success be an expected outcome–due to His character and the faith we have in it?
Ideas, anyone…

Leave a comment