Started reading this N.T. Wright book, Surprised By Hope. He is such a clear thinker and obviously knows a lot about the early Church. I won't go into a lot of detail about what the book is about, but I like how Wright tends to artfully dismantle some of the faulty ways many (myself included) have interpreted (or misinterpreted) scripture from the lens of our post-Enlightenment paradigm. If you are a big fan of Left Behind "theology" than you might not like what Wright has to say, but I think many of his explanations regarding the "things to come" make a lot more sense in light of scripture, cultural context, and the character of God and offer so much more HOPE than the dispensationalist view that I (and many of you) grew up with. It certainly has had me thinking a lot.
Did Jesus really fly "up" into heaven when he ascended?
When Paul talks about believers going "up" to meet him in the sky is this supposed to be taken literally (i.e. a direction in our earthly time/space) or is he describing an event that breaks our tired conceptual mold?
What will heaven look like? What about our resurrected bodies?
Wright has some thought-provoking ideas about our Christian hope; and digging into the culture, worldview, and languages of the early Church has me itching to go to seminary or take some classes or something. Maybe some day…
If you want a little bit to chew on, consider what Wright says about metaphor and the mystery of Christ' ascension:
The mystery of the ascension is of course just that, a mystery. It demands that we think what is, to many today, almost unthinkable: that when the Bible speaks of heaven and earth it is not talking about two localities related to each other within the same space-time continuum or about a nonphysical world contrasted with a physical one but about two different kinds of what we call space, two different kinds of what we call matter, and also quite possibly (though this does not necessarily follow from the other two) two different kinds of what we call time. We post-Enlightenment Westerners are such wretched flatlanders. Although New Age thinkers, and indeed quite a lot of contemporary novelists, are quite capable of taking us into other parallel worlds, spaces, and times, we retreat into our rationalistic closed-system universe as soon as we think about Jesus. C.S. Lewis of course did a great job in the Narnia stories and elsewhere of imagining how two worlds could relate and interlock. But the generation that grew up knowing its way around Narnia does not usually know how to make the transition from a children's story to the real world of grown-up Christian devotion and theology.

Leave a comment